Political integration of 'lusophone' non-national citizens in portugal:perceptions
of key political actors
[Abstract]
Based upon
research conducted between 2001 and 2003, this text explores the
perceptions of key political actors in regard to the political
integration of non-national citizens in Portugal, wondering about their
sensitivity to the idea of stimulating a post-national attitude in this
society. It concludes that political actors tend to recognize the
existence of an incipient participatory dynamic between democracy and
non-national residents. However, positions diverge about the relevance
that such incipience must be given in the evaluation of Portuguese
democracy’s health, denouncing the existence of a tension between a
conservative line of thought that perceives citizenship within the
traditional nation-state’s paradigm, and a progressive line that
perceives it beyond the constraints of national membership. There
persists also a counterproductive bluriness about the citizen as a
non-national and the citizen as a member of an ethnic community – a
problem particularly evident in the analysis of the ‘lusophone’ case.
Images of the public in the debates about risk: consequences for
participation
[Abstract]
This paper
focuses on the difficulties of risk management, specially when the
results from risk perception (the views of the risk by the general
public) do not overlap the results of risk assessment (the results of
technical expert analysis). Two strategies are identified to overcome
these differences: information and partnership, the former being clearly
promoted by the EU values. However, the implementation of this strategy
depends on a image of the public as a partner in these complex societal
negotiations. Three images of the public are identified as particularly
negative to this debate: the image of a emotional public, the idea of a
selfish public and the idea of a biased public. In different ways all of
them convey the idea that the members of the general public should not
be taken seriously, undermining the success of a participatory decision
process.
Democratic breakdown and transitions to democracy in Portugal
[Abstract]
This article
has very modest aspirations: We will utilize elementary game theory in
two versions in order to illuminate how this type of thinking may make
more explicit the analysis of two of Portugal’s most important political
events in modern times: the breakdown of democracy in 1926 and the
transition to democracy in 1974. The first process we will also link to
one type of framework – ‘funnel of causality’ - as a means of organizing
the theoretical understanding of the process. As the reader will
understand, we thus pay special attention to pedagogical instruction and
analytical clarity, rather than an extensive empirical test and
methodological sophistication. In order to give the analysis a
comparative relevance, we shall use concepts of modern breakdown- and
transition theory when commenting on the decisions made by the main
actors.
|